Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 20/2024

Case between Mujeeb K.S vs Rafeeq M.A regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-25
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Closed
Sat, 10/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mujeeb K.S, entered into a construction agreement with the defendant, Rafeeq M.A, but the defendant failed to carry out the work properly. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction due to the defendant's unlawful obstruction of construction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the construction. The plaintiff is entitled to costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the construction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the construction. The plaintiff is entitled to costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1. Hence, I am of the opinion that the issues I to III are to be answered in favour of the plaintiff and are answered so.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: i. The defendant, his men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, from obstructing the construction and from doing any kind of act which disturbs the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mujeeb K.S
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rafeeq M.A
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Building Construction Contract, Building Permit, Sale Deed bearing No. 2358/2013, Settlement Deed bearing No. 3330/2022, Copy of Complaint filed before the SHO, Kalamassery Police Station, Copy of acknowledgment Receipt of petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T. P Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu T.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maitheen M. Pareeth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant, his men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and obstructing construction.
Evidence:
the defendant, his men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, from obstructing the construction and from doing any kind of act which disturbs the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Building Construction Contract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement related to the construction of a residential building between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Building Permit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This permit was necessary for the construction activities undertaken by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document might pertain to any prior agreements regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This complaint relates to the issues faced by the plaintiff due to obstruction from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of acknowledgment Receipt of petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the filing of a petition relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mujeeb K.S vs Rafeeq M.A regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mujeeb K.S vs Rafeeq M.A regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 04/11/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 10/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won