Case Summary
Muhammed Shereef filed a suit against Yoonas for the realization of money. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings while the defendant was present.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default with costs due to the absence of the plaintiff. The defendant was present during the proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to dismissal for default.
The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shereef
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdu Rahman
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yoonas
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.Mehroof Shihab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for realization of money
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Yoonas regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Yoonas regarding realization of money.