Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 160 OF 2017

Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Moothedath Ayishumma et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Shereef filed a suit for partition against Moothedath Ayishumma and others. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing. As a result, the court took no action in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing. As a result, the court took no action in favor of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff name called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Shereef
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moothedath Ayishumma
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majeed
Party Age
42
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdurasheed
Party Age
28
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haseena
Party Age
36
Relation
Rep. By guardian mother 1st defendant
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Najmunneesa
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Dileesh.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P.Ravoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Rafi.E
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Moothedath Ayishumma et al regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Shereef vs Moothedath Ayishumma et al regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won