Case Summary
Muhammed Kutty, represented by his son Sahad, filed a Rent Control Petition against Komu under section 5(1) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not clear
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Rent Controller dismissed the Rent Control Petition filed by Muhammed Kutty against Komu.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Hence Rent Control Petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Kutty
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- Son of Avulan Kutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Komu
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P Shareef
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Majeed Kalappattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P. Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. I.V. Ratheesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Relief claimed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Evidence:
Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Hence Rent Control Petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Komu regarding lease and rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Komu regarding lease and rent control