Case Summary
Muhammed Ashraf filed a case against Abdul Rasheed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court acquitted the accused due to the complainant's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under section 256 Cr.P.C
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under section 256 Cr.P.C due to the complainant's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ashraf
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Rasheed
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Jabir
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal of Abdul Rasheed under section 256 Cr.P.C
Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Ashraf vs Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Ashraf vs Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case