Case Summary
M/s.Indian Bank is the petitioner seeking to review an earlier order. Amal Digital Studio is the respondent who remained absent despite service of notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by M/s.Indian Bank was allowed, granting them another opportunity to proceed with the matter.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was of the view that one more opportunity should be granted to the petitioner.
The court was of the view that one more opportunity should be granted to the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s.Indian Bank, Mayyanad Branch, Kollam
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amal Digital Studio
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sowfiuar. I.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
This petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to restore RP.296/24 on file.
Evidence:
Hence, petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025