Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 528/2025

Case between M/s. Whytaltech Private Limited vs Fitout Interior Solutions regarding money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Whytaltech Private Limited filed a suit against Fitout Interior Solutions for money. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit due to limitation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and no valid reason for the extension of time was provided. The case was found to be barred by limitation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected as the plaintiff was absent and no valid reason for the extension of time was provided. The case was found to be barred by limitation.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and limitation issues.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and limitation issues.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff taken as heard. Suit is one for money. Cause of action arose in the year 2021. No valid reason shown in the plaint to have any exclusion or extension of time.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is one for money. Cause of action arose in the year 2021. No valid reason shown in the plaint to have any exclusion or extension of time. Barred by limitation. Hence suit rejected under order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Whytaltech Private Limited
Party Age
51
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fitout Interior Solutions
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Shaju
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renjith R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anju Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syama S. Murali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ansil B.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for money was rejected.
Evidence:
Barred by limitation. Hence suit rejected under order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Whytaltech Private Limited vs Fitout Interior Solutions regarding money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Whytaltech Private Limited vs Fitout Interior Solutions regarding money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won