Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 589/2022

Case between M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd. vs Joselin Peter et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Joselin Peter and George Joviet. The case was dismissed due to absence of the plaintiffs and defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants. The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants. The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joselin Peter
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o Late Peter
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Joviet
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o Late Joseph
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K B Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vasudevan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd. vs Joselin Peter et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Vazhakkala Kuries Pvt. Ltd. vs Joselin Peter et al regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won