Case Summary
M/s. UCO Bank filed a suit against Sebastian A.R. The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case due to continuous absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or show interest in the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear or show interest in the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear or show interest in the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear or show interest in the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. No steps seen taken by the plaintiff inspite of repeated directions.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff not interested to proceed with this case. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. UCO Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sebastian A.R.
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pearson S. Fernanz
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff not interested to proceed with this case. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Sebastian A.R. regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Sebastian A.R. regarding dismissal for default.