Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.202/2019

Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Lavish EV et al regarding Suit for Realization of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-30
Duration
approximately-6 years 20 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. UCO Bank filed a suit against Lavish EV and Vasudevan Namboothin for the realization of an education loan that was not repaid. The defendants failed to appear in court, and the suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, M/s. UCO Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.9,94,779/- and interest from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, M/s. UCO Bank, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were established through uncontroverted evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claims were established through uncontroverted evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A4 established his case as pleaded by him. The absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim resulted in the plaintiff being entitled to relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.9,94,779/- (Rupees nine lakhs ninety four thousand seven hundred and seventy nine only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. UCO Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lavish EV
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasudevan Namboothinpad EN
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan agreement dated 04.08.2008, Original of sanction letter dated 11.08.2008, Statement of accounts along with certification, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 12.01.2019
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Pearson S. & Fernandez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.9,94,779 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows. 1. Plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.9,94,779 from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of the decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.9,94,779 from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.9,94,779 from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as evidence to support the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original of sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted to show the terms under which the loan was sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of accounts along with certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided the account details and outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendants demanding repayment of the loan amount, which is fundamental to this lawsuit.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Lavish EV et al regarding Suit for Realization of Money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Lavish EV et al regarding Suit for Realization of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won