Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by T.V. Thomas, were absent in court, while the defendants were present. Consequently, the case was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent their case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is Dismissed for Default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Thoppil Fincorp
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T.V.Thomas
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- Proprietor of M/s Thoppil Fincorp
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neethu Shajan
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas C.A
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.S.M.Kabeer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sheeba C
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sherin Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is Dismissed for Default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Deepesh Kumar et al regarding dismissal for default.