Case Summary
M/s Sunitha Sales & Service (p) Ltd. is seeking to recover ₹4,25,760 from Solaman K.J for breach of an indemnity bond and failure to return company property after abandoning his service. The court ordered this recovery due to the defendant's failure to appear in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Monetary recovery of ₹4,25,760 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing Solaman K.J to pay an amount of ₹4,25,760 to M/s Sunitha Sales & Service (p) Ltd., plus interest and costs. The court found that the defendant's abandonment of service resulted in financial loss to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient proof of loss and the terms of the indemnity bond.
The plaintiff provided sufficient proof of loss and the terms of the indemnity bond.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient proof of loss and the terms of the indemnity bond.
The plaintiff provided sufficient proof of loss and the terms of the indemnity bond.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 4,25,760/- (Rupees Four Lakh Twenty-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty only)...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Sunitha Sales & Service (p) Ltd.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.R.Vamanan
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Solaman K.J
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the Power of attorney, Original appointment order, Original indemnity bond, Original delivery note.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.R.Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.S.Letha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹4,25,760 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 4,25,760/- (Rupees Four Lakh Twenty-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty only)...
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the defendant to return the company belongings.
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is further entitled to a decree of mandatory injunction directing the defendant to return the aforesaid company belongings...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted to support the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Original of the appointment order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established the employment relationship and terms.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Original of the Indemnity bond for service
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlined the commitments of the defendant regarding their employment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Original carbon copy of the delivery note
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Verified the delivery of company property to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Sunitha Sales & Service (p) Ltd. vs Solaman K.J regarding money recovery and mandatory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Sunitha Sales & Service (p) Ltd. vs Solaman K.J regarding money recovery and mandatory injunction.