Case Summary
The case involves a petition by Anil Kumar. K to set aside an exparte decree. The respondent, M.S Sreekumar, acknowledged that the costs have been received.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The costs had been received, prompting the allowance of the petition.
The costs had been received, prompting the allowance of the petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The costs had been received, prompting the allowance of the petition.
The costs had been received, prompting the allowance of the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the respondent conceded that the cost has been received.
Judgment Evidence:
the order mentioned above is reviewed and the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.S Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anil Kumar. K
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Maranad G. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition to set aside the exparte decree was allowed.
Evidence:
the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025