Case Summary
The case involves M/s Royal Laminates as the plaintiff and M/s City Aluminum Traders as the defendant. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiff, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Royal Laminates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Harris
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s City Aluminum Traders
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop. S
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C A Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gigi Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Royal Laminates vs M/s City Aluminum Traders regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Royal Laminates vs M/s City Aluminum Traders regarding dismissal of suit