Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 501/2021

Case between M/s. PDL Print vs M/s. Click Outdoor Media et al regarding counter claim dismissal.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-09-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. PDL Print, represented by its Managing Partner Jose Joy, filed a suit against M/s. Click Outdoor Media and its partners. The court dismissed the counter claim due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the counter claim due to the plaintiff's failure to attend despite multiple chances for evidence presentation. The dismissal was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the counter claim due to the plaintiff's failure to attend despite multiple chances for evidence presentation. The dismissal was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence counter claim dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. PDL Print
Relation
represented by its Managing Partner Jose Joy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Click Outdoor Media
Relation
Represented by its Partner Kattikaran Mathew Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kattikkaran Mathew Joseph
Relation
Patner, M/s. Click Outdoor Media
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Xavier Kattikaran Mathew Joseph
Relation
Patner, M/s. Click Outdoor Media
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N. A Shafeek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lal K Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Luxy T.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sonia Shibu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Snita Rose Benjamin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjay Sellen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aditya S Puthezhath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. PDL Print vs M/s. Click Outdoor Media et al regarding counter claim dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. PDL Print vs M/s. Click Outdoor Media et al regarding counter claim dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won