Case Summary
M/s. PARKA International filed a suit against Hilton Ply House and its partners. The parties reached a settlement, and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the settlement memo filed by the parties and dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. PARKA International
- Relation
- Rep. by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mrs. Parvathy Venugopal
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hilton Ply House
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Afsal
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fayis
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Harikrishna Dayal K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Plaintiff represented. Defendants 1 to 3 represented. The learned counsel for plaintiff submits matter settled between parties and hence suit is not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. PARKA International vs Hilton Ply House et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. PARKA International vs Hilton Ply House et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement