Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 432/2025

Case between M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs Nissamudheen S regarding rejection of plaint due to unpaid court fee.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd and Olive Kalista Owner's Association, are involved in a legal dispute against the defendant, Nissamudheen S, concerning a suit that was rejected for lack of court fee payment. The case was heard by the II Additional Munsiff, Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the balance court fee payment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the balance court fee payment.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of the necessary court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected for lack of payment of the necessary court fee.
Supporting Evidence
No Balance Court Fee seen paid.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Olive Kalista Owner's Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nissamudheen S
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. M Jayakrishnan Vazhoor
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreejith V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidyakuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Soumya Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Navaneeth D Pai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishna Prasad K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint has been rejected due to no balance court fee being paid.
Evidence:
No Balance Court Fee seen paid. Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs Nissamudheen S regarding rejection of plaint due to unpaid court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Olive Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs Nissamudheen S regarding rejection of plaint due to unpaid court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won