Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 101/2023

Case between M/s. Naik Distributors vs Yes Marketting et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s. Naik Distributors and Yes Marketting along with another defendant. The suit was settled through mediation, and the court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed based on the mediation agreement. Both parties were represented, and the mediation report was deemed lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the mediation agreement. Both parties were represented, and the mediation report was deemed lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was settled through mediation and deemed lawful by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was settled through mediation and deemed lawful by the court.
Supporting Evidence
This suit having come up before me for hearing on 13.03.2024 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Both sides represented. Settled in mediation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. Mediation agreement will form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Naik Distributors
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yes Marketting
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ezuthullil Suresh
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Janardana Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajen Thampan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tom Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepu Anil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Naik Distributors vs Yes Marketting et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Naik Distributors vs Yes Marketting et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won