Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1156/2017

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Sanjay B.L et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 9 months
Case Code No.
1156
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd filed a suit against Sanjay B.L and others for the recovery of a loan amount due. The defendants failed to repay the loan despite several demands from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the right to recover the due amount from the defendants along with interest. The defendants were found liable for the unpaid loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 1,13,112/- along with 6% interest from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the right to recover the due amount from the defendants along with interest. The defendants were found liable for the unpaid loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated the defendants' liability to repay the loan.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 1,13,112/- along with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanjay B.L
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha.C
Party Age
67
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveen Krishnan
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Power of Attorney in OS No. 1491/2016, Original promissory note, Hire purchase agreement, Original revival letter, Statement of account, True copy of the legal notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ganesh P.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jayarekha G.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Rajendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the amount due along with interest from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 1,13,112/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Twelve only) along with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendants 1 to 3 and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Power of Attorney in OS No. 1491/2016 presented to represent the plaintiff in the current case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original promissory note executed by the defendants to secure the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hire Purchase Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Hire Purchase Agreement outlining the terms of the loan and repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original revival letter executed by the defendants reviving the Hire Purchase Agreement and Demand Promissory Note.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the amount due as of 25/05/2017.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the legal notice issued to the defendants calling for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipts evidencing the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned signed acknowledgment cards from the defendants indicating receipt of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8 series
Document Type: Unserved notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned unserved notice indicating that the notice could not be delivered to one of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of new Power of Attorney to represent the plaintiff since the previous attorney is no longer in service.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won