Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1367/2019

Case between M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Shibu. R et al regarding suit for realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months 19 days
Case Code No.
1367
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited, is suing the defendants for recovery of a loan amount of ₹63,452/- for a motorcycle purchase. The defendants have failed to repay the loan despite multiple demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹63,452/- along with interest and the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹63,452/- with 6% interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay ₹63,452/- along with interest and the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved with evidence that the loan amount was sanctioned and remains unpaid.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved with evidence that the loan amount was sanctioned and remains unpaid.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹63,452/- (Rupees Sixty-Three Thousand and Four Hundred and Fifty-Two only) due from the defendants 1 to 4. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendants 1 to 4 are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹63,452/- (Rupees Sixty Three Thousand and Four Hundred and Fifty Two only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realisation from the defendants 1 to 4 and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vineeth.V.S
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu. R
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhashini
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji. R
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajitha
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Agreement of Hypothecation, Demand Promissory Note, Copy of the statement of account, Copy of the lawyer’s notice, Copy of the Power of Attorney
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Jayakrishnan.D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sheeja M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreelatha M.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Bency M. Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹63,452/- from the defendants with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 63,452₹ (Rupees Sixty Three Thousand and Four Hundred and Fifty Two only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realisation from the defendants 1 to 4 and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of this suit from the defendants 1 to 4 and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement of hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the hire purchase agreement for the loan provided to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This note obligates the defendants to pay the specified amount to the plaintiff on demand.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding amount due from the defendants to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued to the defendants requesting repayment of the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of the Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document authorizes PW1 to act on behalf of the plaintiff in this court case.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 07/22/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won