Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1411/2016

Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited vs Manzoor et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-06-27
Duration
approximately-8 years 6 months
Case Code No.
1411
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited filed a suit against Manzoor and others for the recovery of a loan amount. The plaintiff claimed the defendants failed to repay the granted loan despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, enabling the plaintiff to recover ₹1,63,147 from the defendants along with interest. The plaintiff was also awarded the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹1,63,147 along with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, enabling the plaintiff to recover ₹1,63,147 from the defendants along with interest. The plaintiff was also awarded the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence from the plaintiff, which included executed documents and testimonial affirmation, proved the defendants' liabilities.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence from the plaintiff, which included executed documents and testimonial affirmation, proved the defendants' liabilities.
Supporting Evidence
The oral testimony and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 conclusively establish that the defendants owe an amount of ₹1,63,147/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty-Three Thousand One Hundred and Forty-Seven Only) to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹1,63,147/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty-Three Thousand One Hundred and Forty-Seven Only) from the defendants, along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the suit till realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Limited
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manzoor
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima Beevi
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anzar
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Demand Promissory Note dated 04/01/2013, Original Hire Purchase Agreement dated 04/01/2013, Statement of account from 04/01/2013 to 10/06/2016, Revival letter dated 20/05/2014, Advocate’s notice dated 19/06/2016, Original Power of Attorney dated 26/05/2015
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jayarekha.G.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of ₹1,63,147 from the defendants along with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹1,63,147/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty-Three Thousand One Hundred and Forty-Seven Only) from the defendants, along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing the suit till realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs associated with the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendants and their asset.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants to secure repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hire Purchase Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms under which the loan was granted to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the defendants' payment history and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the defendants' acknowledgment of the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Advocate’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the defendants for compliance with payment demands.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorizes PW1 to act on behalf of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 06/27/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won