O.S. No.313/2019

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Joby U L et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Sumey Chandran

Order Date

2025-08-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd and others are the plaintiffs, while Joby U L and others are the defendants. The suit was not pressed and was dismissed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was not pressed and has been dismissed by the court.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not pursue the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not pursue the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The court noted that the suit was not pressed by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit not pressed, memo filed. Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Manojkumar
Party Age: 41
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rajan A U
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Joby U L
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jisha Joby
Party Age: 35
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jinesh Kumar M V
Party Age: 33
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Salvin Jose
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Belsson Antony
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T V Eldho
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V G Sajeev Panicker
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit not pressed.

Evidence: