Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 56/2023

Case between M/s Malayalam Industries Ltd. vs Sri.Paul Varghese regarding rejection of suit.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Malayalam Industries Ltd. filed a suit against Sri.Paul Varghese. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the court fee led to the rejection of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the court fee led to the rejection of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. BCF not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 04th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Malayalam Industries Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Paul Varghese
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aniyan P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Priya Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Midhila
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Gigimol
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kavya Velayudhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mary Rajula A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to absence and non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. BCF not paid. Plaint Rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Malayalam Industries Ltd. vs Sri.Paul Varghese regarding rejection of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Malayalam Industries Ltd. vs Sri.Paul Varghese regarding rejection of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won