Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 334/2018

Case between M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd. vs Nucleus Premium Properties (P) Ltd regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd., was absent during the hearing, and there was no proof affidavit filed. The defendant's counsel indicated they no longer represented the defendant due to a company takeover, and the court dismissed the suit for default due to inaction from the plaintiff's side.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of filed proof affidavits.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of filed proof affidavits.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant's counsel indicated a lack of representation due to a takeover and the plaintiff's inactivity.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant's counsel indicated a lack of representation due to a takeover and the plaintiff's inactivity.
Supporting Evidence
The defendant's counsel during the morning session has submitted that they are no longer representing, the defendant as the defendant company was taken over.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for the said reasons, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nucleus Premium Properties (P) Ltd
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Raouf P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Rasask C.H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of effective steps taken.
Evidence:
Hence, for the said reasons, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd. vs Nucleus Premium Properties (P) Ltd regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between M/s LULU International Shopping Mall (P) Ltd. vs Nucleus Premium Properties (P) Ltd regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won