Case Summary
M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. and its managing partner C.P. Shoukathali are the plaintiffs. They filed a suit against M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. which was dismissed due to non-compliance with a prior order.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to comply with an earlier order. Consequently, the plaint was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
The plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The order noted that the earlier order was not complied with by the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.P. Shoukathali
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ms. Rekha C. Babu
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.R. Vonod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.S. Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rahul S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Veena Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Sebastian Pulikkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Leah Racheal Ninan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mathew Nevin Thomas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krthik Rajagopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joe S. Adhikaram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Antony Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of Civil Procedure Code.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. et al vs M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. regarding plaint rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Le Paradise Hospitality Pvt.Ltd. et al vs M/s. Harbour View Residency Pvt.Ltd. regarding plaint rejection.