Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1164 of 2019

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ruby Baby et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months 9 days
Case Closed
Fri, 02/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Ruby Baby and Mohanan K.S for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants defaulted on repayment, leading the bank to seek a decree for the owed sum plus interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of Rs.51,626 along with specified interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence and documents proving the defendants' liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided unrebutted evidence and documents proving the defendants' liability.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from Exts.A1 to A6 documents the plaint averments stands proved. Hence the plaintiff bank is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,626 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ruby Baby
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan K.S
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application form dated 14.07.2016, Agreement for General Consumption loans dated 14.07.2016, Promissory note and Take delivery letter to DPN dated 14.07.2016, Computer printout of statement of account dated 22.07.2019, Acknowledgment of debt dated 11.05.2018, Acknowledgment of debt dated 01.10.2018.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja.R.Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,626 along with interest.
Evidence:
A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,626 (Rupees Fifty One thousand Six hundred and Twenty Six only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
B) The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the loan applied for by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement for General Consumption Loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement executed for the loan taken by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Promissory note and Take delivery letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a promissory note signed by the defendants for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the status of the loan account from its inception until a specific date.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt and security of borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an acknowledgment of debt executed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt and security of borrower
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an acknowledgment of debt executed by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ruby Baby et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ruby Baby et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 07/14/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won