Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.980/2020

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Vijay Kumar P. regarding realization of money.

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-10-01
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd., is suing the defendant, Vijay Kumar P., for the recovery of a loan amount due to defaults in payments. The defendant failed to appear in court, and the case proceeded exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Entitled to realize Rs.4,51,163 along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claim was established through unrebutted evidence and supported by the loan agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claim was established through unrebutted evidence and supported by the loan agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A5 established his case as pleaded by him. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict this proof of plaint claim and Exhibits.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.4,51,163 from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vibin Sabu
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijay Kumar P.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of power of attorney, Original preliminary credit facility application, Original credit facility application, Copy of loan recall notice, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lal K. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Luxy T.A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manuel K.M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sethukrishna
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anzil Salm
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,51,163/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.4,51,163/- (Rupees four lakhs fifty one thousand one hundred and sixty three only) from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the amount due from date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,51,163/- from the date of suit till date of decree from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the amount due from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,51,163/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed to establish the authority of the representative of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Preliminary Credit Facility Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original application showing the terms of the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Credit Facility Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original application indicating the conditions under which the loan was provided.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant regarding loan repayment defaults.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the amounts due and the terms of the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the Principal Officer of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Vijay Kumar P. regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Vijay Kumar P. regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/03/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won