Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.698/2020

Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sizad Iqbal regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-03
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Wed, 04/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. suing Sizad Iqbal for the recovery of a loan amount due to non-repayment. The defendant failed to appear in court, resulting in an ex-parte judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.2,67,939 along with interest for the loan default. The defendant's assets were also deemed liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,67,939 along with interest @11.69% per annum and @6% from the date of decree until payment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.2,67,939 along with interest for the loan default. The defendant's assets were also deemed liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case due to defendant's failure to repay the loan despite repeated notices.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case due to defendant's failure to repay the loan despite repeated notices.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.2,67,939 along with interest @11.69% per annum from 21.08.2020 till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sizad Iqbal
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of Power of Attorney, Original Preliminary Credit facility application form, Original Credit Facility application Form, True copy of loan recall notice, True copy of the account statement pertaining to the loan account along with IT Certificate
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lal.K.Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chacko Mathews.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anzil Salim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sethukrishna.R.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manuel.K.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Luxy.T.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs.2,67,939 along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.2,67,939 (Rupees Two lakhs sixty seven thousand nine hundred and thirty nine only) along with interest @11.69% per annum from 21.08.2020 till the date of decree and @ 6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall be personally liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
2) Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
3) Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a true copy of the Power of Attorney.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Preliminary Credit Facility Application form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the defendant applied for a preliminary credit facility from the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Credit Facility Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the credit facility application form submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a true copy of the loan recall notice issued to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a true copy of the account statement showing the defendant's default in repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sizad Iqbal regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Sizad Iqbal regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 04/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won