Case Summary
M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Kidilam Mens Wear and Footwear and Najeeb S. The plaint was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and the non-remittance of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The court ruled that the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s ICICI Bank Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kidilam Mens Wear and Footwear
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Najeeb S
- Party Age
- 36
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Sathisan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhiram Sunish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Athira Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Kidilam Mens Wear and Footwear et al regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between M/s ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Kidilam Mens Wear and Footwear et al regarding rejection of plaint