Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 3 /2020

Case between M/S Excellent Lamination and Marketing Company vs M/S Emmatys Packagings regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/S Excellent Lamination and Marketing Company suing M/S Emmatys Packagings for the realization of money. The matter has been settled in mediation, and the court accepted the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, which has been accepted by the court as lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement, which has been accepted by the court as lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report was received as successful and the terms were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report was received as successful and the terms were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of mediation agreement are found to be lawful and hence accepted and recorded here with.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S Excellent Lamination and Marketing Company
Relation
represented by its Managing Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S Emmatys Packagings
Party Age
75
Relation
represented by its Partner and authorized Signatory
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Wilson George
Party Age
75
Relation
Partner and authorized Signatory M/S Emmatys Packagings
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.B. Xavier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Narayanan.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.S.Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Binod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suseela Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudeep Aravind Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The mediation agreement shall form part of decree. Hence suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/S Excellent Lamination and Marketing Company vs M/S Emmatys Packagings regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/S Excellent Lamination and Marketing Company vs M/S Emmatys Packagings regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won