Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 459/2018

Case between M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Don Bosco Industries regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-06-28
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 06/28/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against M/s Don Bosco Industries for the recovery of money owed. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to pay outstanding dues for goods supplied on credit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed, and the plaintiff was not entitled to a decree for the realization of the amount claimed. The court found in favor of the defendant on the basis of limitation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed, and the plaintiff was not entitled to a decree for the realization of the amount claimed. The court found in favor of the defendant on the basis of limitation.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the suit was barred by law of limitation.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the suit was barred by law of limitation.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was barred by limitation as the acknowledgment of debt and the alleged payment occurred after the lapse of the limitation period.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. Plaintiff is not entitled for a decree of realization of Rs. 1,41,077/- from the defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd
Relation
represented by its Power of Attorney holder and Senior Manager Sri.Jinu George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Don Bosco Industries
Party Age
40
Relation
represented by its proprietor Nevin Pereira
Plaintiffs Documents
Combined original ledger statement, True copy of the lawyer notice, Original reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal
Defendants Documents
Lawyer notice, Office copy of the reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal, Postal receipt, Postal acknowledgment card

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shiju Vargehse
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pramoj Abraham
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benoy Bal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajeev K Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajmal A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover an outstanding amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed. Plaintiff is not entitled for a decree of realization of Rs. 1,41,077/- from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Combined original ledger statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the amount owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence of the demand for payment made to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence regarding the communication between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Included in the defendant's contentions against the claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Office copy of the reply issued by Adv.Benoy Bal
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided as a response to the allegations made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Evidence of communication sent by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirmed the receipt of correspondence by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Don Bosco Industries regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Desai Brothers (papers) Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Don Bosco Industries regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 06/28/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda, Vazhakkala Branch vs Pushpa P regarding Suit for realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Money Easy Fincorp vs Devasia Thomas et al. regarding realization of money
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Kulsum Boutique and Beauty Parlour et al regarding Money Realisation
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Ashraya Kerala JLG Unit et al regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won