Case Summary
M/s. Cochin Drug House is the plaintiff and Mr. Peter is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation in court. No proof affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff failed to appear and provide evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. No representation. Listed case. No proof affidavit filed. Plaintiff not present for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Cochin Drug House
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Peter
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. A Matin Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C. A Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jasna K.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Cochin Drug House vs Mr. Peter regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Cochin Drug House vs Mr. Peter regarding suit dismissal