Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P No. 384/2025

Case between M/s Chendayad Granites Pvt. Ltd vs M/s. Kurumbalakkattu Construction Company regarding execution petition.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2026-01-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s Chendayad Granites Pvt. Ltd, represented by Sri. C.G. George, filed an execution petition against M/s. Kurumbalakkattu Construction Company. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder and failure to cure defects in the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and lack of necessary representations.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and lack of necessary representations.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder failed to appear and did not cure the defects in the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder failed to appear and did not cure the defects in the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder failed to appear and did not cure the defects in the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

EP is defective. Though time had been sought to take steps to cure defect and it had been submitted that steps had been taken, no steps seen taken. Decree Holder is absent without representation. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Chendayad Granites Pvt. Ltd
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Kurumbalakkattu Construction Company
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sasankan Muthirakkal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelakshmi P.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holder and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Decree Holder no representation. EP is defective. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Chendayad Granites Pvt. Ltd vs M/s. Kurumbalakkattu Construction Company regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Chendayad Granites Pvt. Ltd vs M/s. Kurumbalakkattu Construction Company regarding execution petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won