Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 16/2019

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P. Paul et al regarding recovery of money

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises and its partners, are suing the defendants for recovery of money related to chitty transactions. The defendants defaulted on payments for the installments of the chitty.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to pay a total of Rs. 2,16,000 along with interest. The plaintiffs were recognized as entitled to recover the owed amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 2,16,000 along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and future interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to pay a total of Rs. 2,16,000 along with interest. The plaintiffs were recognized as entitled to recover the owed amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to provide evidence to establish their claims and were found to be liable for payment based on the agreements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants failed to provide evidence to establish their claims and were found to be liable for payment based on the agreements.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 read along with Ext. A1 to A4 proves that the defendants are liable to pay the amount on default of repayment of the auctioned chitty.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants are hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 2,16,000/- along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsala Mukundan
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tony
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu P. Paul
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paulose
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Paulose
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copies of chitty agreements, original receipts, and legal notices.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.M. John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anand Omanakuttam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 2,16,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 2,16,000/- along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature and circumstances of the case, the plaintiffs are entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chitty Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of chitty agreement of Chitty No. 75 with statement No. 28.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Chitty Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of chitty agreement of Chitty No. 75 with Statement No. 29.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of acknowledgment card.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of registration certificate issued by registrar of firms.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of judgment in O.S.No.454/2015.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Form B notice issued as per Rule 4 of the Punjab Shops and Commercial establishment Rules, 1958.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Form F statement of registration of establishment issued as per Rule 13 of the Punjab shops and commercial Establishment Rule, Act 1958.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Ledger of chitty account book of chitty No.75/2011.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P. Paul et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P. Paul et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Mon, 01/21/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vipin Venugopal et al regarding recovery of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aruldas vs Thankamma, Rani regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Apple Digital Hub et al regarding recovery of money
Court of the Munsiff at Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won