Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.33/2023

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Mahin.P.A. regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Canara Bank, is seeking to recover money from the defendant, Mahin.P.A., due to default on a vehicle loan. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the owed amount along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.4,23,476.05/- along with interest at the specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the owed amount along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established a case based on the evidence and documents provided, including the defendant's acknowledgment of debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established a case based on the evidence and documents provided, including the defendant's acknowledgment of debt.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,23,476.05/- with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.4,23,476.05/- (Rupees Four lakhs twenty three thousand four hundred and seventy six and five paise only) along with interest @12.05% per annum from 10.01.2023 till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization, as the case may be, to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Manager & Principal Officer, Anju Pushkaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahin.P.A.
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Particulars of assets and liabilities, Receipt for Rs.2,05,000/-, Composite Hypothecation agreement, Acknowledgements of Debt, Certified copy of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suja.R.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu.P.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,23,476.05 with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,23,476.05 with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall be personally liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of Syndicate Bank as acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of Syndicate Bank as acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of Syndicate Bank as acknowledgment of debt.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the first defendant in favour of Syndicate Bank for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the first defendant in favour of Syndicate Bank for the loan collateral.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows details of the defendant's loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to the defendant demanding the outstanding liability.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the lawyer notice that was issued.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Mahin.P.A. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Mahin.P.A. regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won