Case Summary
M/s Cananra Bank filed a suit against Unnimaya. U and Unnikrishna Pillai. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not remitting the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with the requirement to remit the balance court fee.
The plaintiff did not comply with the requirement to remit the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff represented. Balance Court Fee not remitted so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected U/O 7 R.11 (C) of CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Cananra Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnimaya. U
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unnikrishna Pillai
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I. Sowfiuar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted so far. Hence plaint rejected U/O 7 R.11 (C) of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of court fee
Case Code
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs Unnimaya. U et al regarding balance court fee not remitted.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs Unnimaya. U et al regarding balance court fee not remitted.