Case Summary
M/s Cananra Bank filed a suit for the realisation of money against M/s Kuppayakkada and Saifuniza. The plaintiff was absent, and the court dismissed the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's request as the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. No BCF remitted. Sufficient opportunity given. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Cananra Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Officer and Power holder
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Kuppayakkada
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saifuniza
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- I. Sowfiuar & U. Ullas Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs M/s Kuppayakkada, Saifuniza regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Cananra Bank vs M/s Kuppayakkada, Saifuniza regarding realisation of money.