Case Summary
The plaintiff, M/s ASWA-CON, was absent and not represented in court, while the defendants were present. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. Defendant represented. Plaintiff continuously absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s ASWA-CON
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nellaya Puthapeedikakkal Nishad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nashid Nellayaputhen Peedikakkal
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shameel Ponnangathodi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdulla Puthenpeedika Haseeb
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s ASWA-CON vs M/s Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt Ltd et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s ASWA-CON vs M/s Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt Ltd et al regarding dismissal for default.