Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 685 /2024

Case between M/s Ador Welding Ltd. et al vs M/s Zip-Zoom Rexine House et al regarding Civil Suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves M/s Ador Welding Ltd. and two individuals as plaintiffs and a partnership firm along with two advocates as defendants. The plaintiffs decided not to pursue the case further, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiffs indicated they were not interested in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiffs indicated they were not interested in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs chose not to proceed with the suit, resulting in dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs chose not to proceed with the suit, resulting in dismissal.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Ador Welding Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Bastian Cherian
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Alda Bastin
Party Age
29
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Zip-Zoom Rexine House
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dalby Immanuel Palamoottil
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Josmy Thomas
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jinishlal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anu Philipose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raghunath N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shiju Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G Anantha narayanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed. All interim orders stand vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Ador Welding Ltd. et al vs M/s Zip-Zoom Rexine House et al regarding Civil Suit
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Ador Welding Ltd. et al vs M/s Zip-Zoom Rexine House et al regarding Civil Suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won