Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 164/2024

Case between Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim vs M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET et al regarding rent control petition.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim filed a rent control petition against M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET and other respondents. The matter was settled, and the petition was not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed following a settlement between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhavesh Ravindra Gokal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumesh Karunakaran
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.K. Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chithra R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R. Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Sabir V.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Petition is not pressed and hence the rent control petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter is settled and hence petition is not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim vs M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET et al regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Zareen Ibrahim vs M/S SUNRISE CITY SUPERMARKET et al regarding rent control petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown