Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 935/2024

Case between Mrs. Elizabath Joseph vs Joseph regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mrs. Elizabath Joseph, the defendant, filed for a temporary injunction against Joseph, the plaintiff, who allegedly trespassed into her property and caused damage. The court considered the evidence presented and the claims made by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the defendant, restraining the plaintiff from trespassing into her property. The decision was based on the evidence showing a prima facie case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the defendant, restraining the plaintiff from trespassing into her property. The decision was based on the evidence showing a prima facie case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant demonstrated a prima facie case and the risk of irreparable injury without the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is seen prima facie that the plaint A and B schedule properties can be differentiated and identified. The defendant has a case that the plaintiff is trespassing into her property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA allowed as follows: i. The plaintiff and his men and agents are restrained by way of an order of temporary injunction from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Elizabath Joseph
Party Age
74
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney, Copy of Judgment in WP(c) No. 35238/2023, Acknowledgment Receipt of Petition
Defendants Documents
None

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherry J. James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renish Raveendran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. M Sajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidarath S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sneha K Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff and his agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff and his men and agents are restrained by way of an order of temporary injunction from trespassing into the plaint B schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Submitted to support the defendant's petition.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Judgment in WP(c) No. 35238/2023
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Referenced in the context of the defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt of Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided to show formal complaint made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt of Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Included to detail another complaint by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of CMP No. 3070/2024
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Relevant to the ongoing legal battle regarding property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Proceedings in CMP 3070/2024
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documented proceedings that support the defendant's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Report in CMP 3070/2024 filed by SHO
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to substantiate the defendant's allegations.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Used to assess boundary issues in the property dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mrs. Elizabath Joseph vs Joseph regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mrs. Elizabath Joseph vs Joseph regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won