Case Summary
Mr. Stanislaus Fenol, the plaintiff, did not represent himself in court and failed to take the necessary steps to issue summons. As a result, the case was dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff failed to appear or take necessary actions, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's failure to represent and take steps led to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's failure to represent and take steps led to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's failure to represent and take steps led to the dismissal.
The plaintiff's failure to represent and take steps led to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. No steps taken to issue summons as ordered.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 26.03.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. Stanislaus Fenol
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Abdul Nazar A. A
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Benny M. John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pinky A. R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Stanislaus Fenol vs Mr. Abdul Nazar A. A regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Stanislaus Fenol vs Mr. Abdul Nazar A. A regarding dismissal of suit.