Case Summary
Mr. Shabeer P @ Shabeer Pathan, a film producer, filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against Mr. V S Lalan, the producer of the film 'Rudhiram'. The petitioner alleges breach of contract regarding credits and financial transparency.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for temporary injunction requested by the petitioner, finding no merit in the claims made.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case for the injunction.
The petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case for the injunction.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case for the injunction.
The petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the petitioner has failed to prove prima facie case.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mr. Shabeer P @ Shabeer Pathan
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. V S Lalan
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement executed between the defendant and the plaintiff, Printout of invitation for pooja of the new film ‘Rudhiram’, Pack up day poster of the film ‘Rudhiram’, First look poster of the film ‘Rudhiram’, Copy of complaint filed before the President, Kerala Film Producers Association by the defendant.
Defendants Documents
Copy of the poster of the Movie ‘Shesham Michael Fathima’, Copy of promotion materials of the movie ‘Sanidhanam P O’.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Martin Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V A Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Eldho Cherian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Philip T Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thomas T Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Achu Shubha Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nitya R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amala Purushothaman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rineesha Rajkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Urmila M G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Maria Angel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mary Aleena Surrao
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
To restrain the respondents from promoting and distributing the film 'Rudhiram' without proper acknowledgment of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The petitioner has failed to prove prima facie case.
Relief Type:
Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
To prevent the respondents from selling any rights of the film without the petitioner's consent.
Evidence:
The injunction sought is almost in mandatory terms and unless a very strong case is made out such a relief cannot be granted at this stage.
Relief Type:
Disclosure of accounts
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
To compel the disclosure of production expenses and income from distributions.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to prove that respondent is having an obligation to produce the same.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between the defendant and the plaintiff regarding the production roles and responsibilities.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Printout
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Invitation for pooja of the new film 'Rudhiram'.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Poster
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pack up day poster of the film 'Rudhiram'.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Poster
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
First look poster of the film 'Rudhiram' showing the plaintiff's name in an insignificant manner.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint filed before the President, Kerala Film Producers Association by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Poster
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of the poster of the Movie 'Shesham Michael Fathima'.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type:
Promotion Materials
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of promotion materials of the movie 'Sanidhanam P O'.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Shabeer P @ Shabeer Pathan vs Mr. V S Lalan regarding temporary injunction for film project 'Rudhiram'
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Shabeer P @ Shabeer Pathan vs Mr. V S Lalan regarding temporary injunction for film project 'Rudhiram'