Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 672/2025

Case between Mr. Jose Abraham vs M/s. Varmora Granito Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-18
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months
Case Closed
Sat, 10/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mr. Jose Abraham, who was an employee of the defendants, is seeking payment of owed salary and travel allowance after his resignation. The defendants failed to respond or appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the owed amount with interest. The defendants failed to appear, leading to a decree against them.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of ₹1,92,000 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the owed amount with interest. The defendants failed to appear, leading to a decree against them.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff established the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The uncontested evidence of the plaintiff established the case.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 1,92,000/- (Rupees one lakh ninety two thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants or from assets of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mr. Jose Abraham
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Varmora Granito Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Managing Director, Mr. Manish Varmora
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Varmora Granito Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by Regional Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 -- Appointment Letter issued by Nextile Marbosys Pvt. Ltd., A2 -- Computer print out of Pay Slip issued by Nextile Marbosys Pvt. Ltd., A3 -- Computer print out of e mail message, A4 -- Computer print out of letter regarding acceptance of resignation, A5 -- Computer print out of e mail message, A6 -- Certificate u/s. 63 of Bharatiya Skashya Adhiniyam Act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S Unnikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adithya Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Ardra Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sohan Varghese Francis
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Diya Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of outstanding salary and allowances from defendants.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the defendants owe a total amount of 1,92,000/- to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover interest on the principal amount due.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that fixing the rate of interest at 6% per annum (simple interest) as post suit interest will suffice interest of justice.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit from defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Appointment Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the employment relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pay Slip
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant for demonstrating the salary aspects of the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email Message
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides communication evidence related to the employment termination.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter regarding acceptance of resignation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the acceptance of the plaintiff's resignation by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Email Message
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional communication relevant to the case context.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certificate u/s. 63 of Bharatiya Skashya Adhiniyam Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant for legal compliance in the context of the employment and dues claimed.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mr. Jose Abraham vs M/s. Varmora Granito Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Mr. Jose Abraham vs M/s. Varmora Granito Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 12/04/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 10/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won