Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 272 OF 2014

Case between M.P. Mani et al vs Subrahmanian @ Babu et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
SRI. ARAVIND BEDAYODI
Order Date
2016-07-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs M.P. Mani and others seeking a partition against defendants Subrahmanian @ Babu and others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' failure to take steps for service of summons to several defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs' suit for partition was dismissed due to their failure to take steps for service of summons to several defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs' suit for partition was dismissed due to their failure to take steps for service of summons to several defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not take necessary actions to progress the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs not take steps for service of summons to defendants 7 to 10, though several months time granted.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.P. Mani
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayyappan.E.P.
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raghavan.K.
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kousalya
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subrahmanian @ Babu
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayyappan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumini
Party Age
43
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jagadeesh
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suresh A Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Bhavesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiffs not taking steps for service of summons to defendants 7 to 10.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs not take steps for service of summons to defendants 7 to 10, though several months time granted. Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.P. Mani et al vs Subrahmanian @ Babu et al regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between M.P. Mani et al vs Subrahmanian @ Babu et al regarding partition.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 07/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won