Case Summary
Plaintiff Moosa aged 60 filed a suit against defendants seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed for default due to lack of steps taken.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as no steps were taken.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
No reasoning provided in the judgment.
Judgment Evidence:
No formal final order mentioned in the judgment.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moosa
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Yahu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manjulal
- Relation
- Sub Inspector of Police
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o. AyamathuHaji (late)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hakkeem
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o. Ayamathu Haji (late)
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.K. Noushad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C. Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Injunction sought by plaintiff Moosa.
Evidence:
No formal order mentioned in the judgment.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Moosa vs Manjulal et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Moosa vs Manjulal et al regarding injunction