Case Summary
The plaintiff, Mohanan, filed a suit for the fixation of boundary and injunction against the defendant, Raju John. Both parties were absent during the hearing but the defendant was represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made, leading to dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 29th day of May, 2025
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohanan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju John
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adarsh S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prince Kumar G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for fixation of boundary and injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the Plaintiff for fixation of boundary and injunction u/s 26, u/o VII Rule 1 & 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohanan vs Raju John regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mohanan vs Raju John regarding fixation of boundary and injunction