Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.103/2018

Case between Mohanan et al vs Natesan et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-7 years 5 months
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Mohanan, Prasannan, and Sanu against defendants Natesan, Siby, and Shaji. It revolves around a dispute that was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the terms of the mediation settlement to be lawful. The suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the terms of the mediation settlement to be lawful. The suit was decreed in accordance with the compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation report and compromise petition were accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation report and compromise petition were accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of agreement found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasannan
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanu
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Natesan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Siby
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report, Compromise petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.B.Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.M.Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.D.Subhash Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohanan et al vs Natesan et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Mohanan et al vs Natesan et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won