Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 335/2024

Case between Mohammed vs Saidu Muhammed regarding lifting the attachment order

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed is the plaintiff seeking the lifting of an attachment order. Saidu Muhammed is the defendant involved in the case.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as it was resolved through a compromise agreement. The petition for lifting the attachment was allowed and the attachment was raised.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as it was resolved through a compromise agreement. The petition for lifting the attachment was allowed and the attachment was raised.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement and as the claim was satisfied.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement and as the claim was satisfied.

Judgment Evidence:

Heard. Suit dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement and as claim satisfied. No purpose to continue attachment. Petition stands allowed. Attachment raised.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saidu Muhammed
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Rafy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anvarsha Shamsu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Aslam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Midhun Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashtar B. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Riswan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thajuddeen E.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ranshad K.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Lifting the attachment order and allowing the petition.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as per the terms of the compromise agreement and as claim satisfied. No purpose to continue attachment. Petition stands allowed. Attachment raised.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed vs Saidu Muhammed regarding lifting the attachment order
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed vs Saidu Muhammed regarding lifting the attachment order

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M. G Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding return of money
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M. G. Sukumaran vs Aboobacker regarding petition for lifting attachment
THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won