Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1161/2025

Case between Mohammed Rasiq M K vs Makesense Advertising et al regarding realization of money and for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mohammed Rasiq M K has filed a suit against Makesense Advertising and Renjith Mohan P M for realization of money and a permanent prohibitory injunction related to advertisements. The parties reached a compromise, settling their disputes amicably.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit as per the terms of the agreement. Both parties agreed on various terms related to credits and financial disputes.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed as per the joint compromise agreement.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise reached between the parties and decreed the suit as per the terms of the agreement. Both parties agreed on various terms related to credits and financial disputes.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the compromise was entered into voluntarily and is lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the compromise was entered into voluntarily and is lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced that the parties have entered into the compromise voluntarily. As per Order 23 Rule 3, this court is satisfied that dispute as to the subject matter of the suit has been settled between the parties, and the compromise in writing is signed by the parties. The terms of the compromise are lawful and hence the compromise is recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as per the joint compromise agreement as follows: ... Both parties hereby agree that all claims of either parties pertaining to the cause of action in the suit are amicably settled between the parties as per the terms of this agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mohammed Rasiq M K
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Makesense Advertising
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjith Mohan P M
Party Age
33
Relation
Father's name not known to the plaintiff
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sojo J Kallidukkil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Muralikrishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Achuth J Warrier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sruthi R Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahul K Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
VS Shiraz Bava
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T R Vishnu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Leena James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjana TS
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The parties have agreed to settle the financial dispute and terms of advertisement credits.
Evidence:
this court is satisfied that dispute as to the subject matter of the suit has been settled between the parties, and the compromise in writing is signed by the parties.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Financial dispute settled for an amount of Rs.1,50,000/-.
Evidence:
the financial dispute between the parties pertaining to the subject matter of the suit is here by settled for an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- which is paid on this the 2ⁿᵈ December, 2025

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mohammed Rasiq M K vs Makesense Advertising et al regarding realization of money and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Mohammed Rasiq M K vs Makesense Advertising et al regarding realization of money and for permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won